Availability of PPD Information
Payments Timetable
No Cheaper Stock Obtainable Endorsements
Volume & Cost of Prescribing
Freedom of Information
Pre Payment Certificate
Drug Tariff
Dictionary of Medicines and Devices
In-Demand
Annual Report in PDF - Adobe Acrobat Reader required
Business Strategy
Prescribing Review
pointer - you are here
Age Printed Concession
Prescription Switching
English Presctiption Forms
Capacity Improvement Programme (CIP) - Information for Contractors
 
PPD home image
 

PACT Centre Pages - DRUGS FOR DYSPEPSIA


print optionsPrint Options: Adobe Acrobat

 

Dyspepsia is any symptom of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, present for 4 weeks or more, including upper abdominal pain or discomfort, heartburn, acid reflux, nausea, or vomiting.1 Each year about 40% of adults suffer from dyspepsia, 5% will consult their GP and 1% are referred for endoscopy.1 Of those patients who have dyspepsia investigated by endoscopy, 40% have gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), 40% non-ulcer dyspepsia and 13% some form of ulcer. Over the last 5 years prescribing of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased whilst prescribing of antacids and H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) has fallen (Chart 1). Spending on drugs to treat dyspepsia has decreased from a peak in December 2004 (Chart 2); this is mainly due to price reductions for the H2RAs, omeprazole and lansoprazole.
 

enlarge

Trends in Prescribing of Cardiovascular Drugs (Chart 1)
Trends in Prescribing of Drugs for Dyspepsia in General Practice in England (Chart 1)
 
enlarge
Trends in Spending on Cardiovascular Drugs (Chart 2)
Trends in Spending on Antacids and Ulcer Healing Drugs in England (Chart 2)

All patients should be referred for endoscopic investigation urgently (within 2 weeks) where any of the following alarm symptoms are present: chronic GI bleeding, progressive unintentional weight loss, progressive difficulty swallowing, persistent vomiting, iron deficiency anaemia, epigastric mass or suspicious barium meal.1 Patients aged 55 years and older with unexplained and persistent recent-onset dyspepsia alone should also be referred urgently for endoscopy.1 Unexplained dyspepsia is defined as symptom(s) and/or sign(s) that have not led to a diagnosis being made by the primary care professional after initial assessment of the history, examination and primary care investigations. Less than 3% of patients who have an endoscopy will have gastric or oesophageal cancer.1


Uninvestigated dyspepsia
Lifestyle advice (including healthy eating, weight reduction, smoking cessation and alcohol intake) and medication review should be offered to all patients with dyspepsia. Self-treatment with antacid and/or alginate therapy is suitable for most patients, however additional therapy may be required where symptoms do not respond or worsen. Treatment of uninvestigated dyspepsia is either to test for and eradicate Helicobacter pylori or to use empirical treatment with a PPI for one month.1 In trials of patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia PPIs are more effective at reducing symptoms of dyspepsia than antacids and H2RAs (numbers needed to treat (NNT) 6 and 5 respectively).1 A H2RA or prokinetic drug may benefit individual patients if a PPI provides an inadequate response. It may be appropriate to refer the minority of patients who do not respond to therapy to a specialist.1


Helicobacter pylori: testing and eradication
H. pylori is present in approximately 40% of the UK population and probably causes no harm in most people.1,2 Before testing for H. pylori it is necessary to withdraw PPIs for 2 weeks. A non-invasive carbon urea breath test or stool antigen test is usually used to test for H. pylori; both tests show better specificity than serology testing. Eradication treatment should be prescribed for H. pylori positive patients consisting of a 7-day course of a PPI, with either metronidazole 400mg and clarithromycin 250mg, or amoxicillin 1g and clarithromycin 500mg.1 Any re-testing for H. pylori should be performed using a carbon urea breath test.


Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD)

Previously GORD would be diagnosed when reflux symptoms were predominant,2 however, patients with uninvestigated 'reflux-like' symptoms should be managed as patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia.1 GORD refers to oesophagitis determined by endoscopic examination or endoscopy-negative reflux disease (i.e. no oesophageal mucosal breaks seen on endoscopy). A treatment dose of a PPI for 1 or 2 months should be offered to patients with GORD.1 For recurring symptoms after initial treatment, a PPI should be offered with a limited number of repeat prescriptions, and at the lowest dose possible to control symptoms, patient care should be reviewed at least annually.1

PPIs reduce relapse in people with healed reflux oesophagitis compared with H2RAs and placebo.3 There are no long-term trial data for PPI therapy in endoscopy-negative reflux disease. However, rather than patients taking continuous therapy it seems cost-effective to offer patients either intermittent one month full dose therapy or as-required PPI treatment.1 H. pylori eradication does not benefit people with GORD.4 For the small number of patients who have persistent symptoms despite PPI treatment, the options include double dose PPI therapy, adding a H2RA at bedtime and extending the treatment length.1

Barrett's oesophagus affects a small minority of people with GORD; it is diagnosed in 1.4% of endoscopies in the UK.1 Barrett's oesophagus increases the risk of adenocarcinoma, however the size of this increased risk has not been quantified. There is insufficient evidence to assess the clinical effectiveness of continued endoscopic surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus.5

 
Non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD)
If H pylori are present in patients with NUD, this should be eradicated and symptoms will improve in around 36% of patients, however over a 3-12 month period around 57% of substantial symptoms will remain.1 If patients' symptoms persist following treatment or exclusion of H. pylori, a low dose PPI or H2RA should be offered for one month and then continued on an as-required basis with a limited number of repeat prescriptions.1 Antacid therapy is not effective for reducing symptoms of NUD.1
 
Peptic ulcer disease (PUD)
Up to 95% and 70% of patients with proven duodenal ulcers and gastric ulcers, respectively, will have H. pylori infection.6 Patients who are H. pylori positive should be offered eradication therapy which increases duodenal ulcer healing (NNT 18) and reduces recurrence (NNT 2) compared to patients receiving acid suppression therapy only.1 Gastric ulcer healing rates are not increased with H. pylori eradication compared to acid suppression alone, however, recurrence of gastric ulcer is improved. Patients with gastric ulcer and H. pylori should receive a repeat endoscopy and retesting for H. pylori at 6-8 weeks after beginning treatment.1 Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use should be stopped where possible in patients diagnosed with PUD. A PPI or H2RA for 2 months should be given to patients with NSAID-induced PUD, and if H. pylori is present eradication therapy should be offered subsequently.1 H. pylori negative patients who do not take NSAIDs should receive treatment doses of a PPI or a H2RA for 1-2 months, which heals peptic ulcers in most cases.
 
Gastroprotection with NSAIDs
Before prescribing an NSAID, patients should be assessed for the risk of GI adverse effects and NSAIDs should be avoided in patients at high risk (risk factors include: age over 65 years; using other medicines known to increase the chance of upper GI adverse events; serious co-morbidity and previous history of PUD/dyspepsia). Patients who need an NSAID but are at high risk of GI adverse events could take a gastroprotective agent with their NSAID; PPIs are most often prescribed. Alternatively misoprostol could be tried since it reduces the risk of clinically important ulcer complications.7 For patients who experience dyspepsia while taking low dose aspirin, a PPI should be tried before prescribing clopidogrel instead of aspirin.8 Clopidogrel can be considered where aspirin is contraindicated or there is genuine aspirin intolerance. NSAIDs and Cox-II selective inhibitors increase the risk of hypertension, heart failure and renal failure. Cox-II selective inhibitors are associated with a moderate increase in the risk of vascular events, in particular myocardial infarction.9,10 The balance of GI and cardiovascular risk should be considered in all patients before prescribing a Cox-II selective inhibitor.9 There is no good evidence to support the use of Cox-II selective inhibitors instead of traditional NSAIDs to reduce serious upper GI complications and NSAID-associated dyspepsia.11 There is still a high volume of prescription items for Cox-II selective inhibitors despite a sharp decline over the last 2 years (649,000 items quarter to March 2006). Prescribing of NSAIDs (including Cox-II selective inhibitors) fell by 12% over the last 2 years to 4.5 million items (quarter to March 2006).

enlarge
Trends in Spending on Cardiovascular Drugs (Chart 2)

Variation Between Strategic Health Authorities in Spending on Drugs for Dyspepsia
(Quarter to March 2006) (Chart 3)

enlarge
Trends in Spending on Cardiovascular Drugs (Chart 2)

Prices based on Drug Tariff July 2006 or Chemist & Druggist July 2006

Prescribing data

Prescribing of PPIs has nearly doubled over the last 5 years. In the quarter to March 2006, PPIs account for 73% of items (6.1 million) and 92% of cost (£104.5 million) for all drugs used for dyspepsia. Lansoprazole and omeprazole are the most commonly prescribed PPIs (2.5 million items each, quarter to March 2006). Over the last 5 years prescribing has risen by 78% for lansoprazole and by 109% for omeprazole. These two drugs cost £43 million and £37 million respectively, quarter to March 2006. Esomeprazole items have increased to nearly 400,000 per quarter (£10.2 million). Rabeprazole and pantoprazole account for 352,000 items and 277,000 items respectively, costing £7.4 million and £5.6 million per quarter. Spending (NIC/1000 STAR-PUs) varies 2-fold across strategic health authorities (SHAs) for PPIs (Chart 3). In 7 SHAs "other proton pump inhibitors" (esomeprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole) account for more than 25% of the total spend. Esomeprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole offer no clinical advantage over either omeprazole or lansoprazole, which are both cost-effective choices.2 The cost of 28 days of omeprazole or lansoprazole at treatment doses is between a third and a half of the cost of the newer PPI drugs (Price Chart). Prescriptions for omeprazole and lansoprazole should be for the standard capsules or tablets.

Prescribing of H2RAs has fallen by 33% during the last 5 years, with cost decreasing by 74%. Ranitidine is the most commonly prescribed accounting for nearly 82% of H2RA items (800,000) and 72% of cost (£2.5 million), quarter to March 2006. Cimetidine accounts for 12% of H2RA items (118,000) and 11% of cost (£0.4 million).

Items for 'drugs for dyspepsia and GORD' (BNF section 1.1) have decreased by 24% over the last 5 years to 1.3 million items, costing just under £6 million, quarter to March 2006. Compound alginates account for 91% of items (1.2 million) and 94% of cost (£5.6 million) for this group of drugs. Gaviscon® is the most commonly prescribed compound alginate, over the last 5 years its prescribing has fallen by 31% to 888,000 items per quarter (costing £4.9 million). Prescribing of Peptac® has almost trebled over the last 5 years (235,000 items, £0.5 million per quarter). There are 119,000 items for antacids and simeticone per quarter, costing £0.38 million.

 
REFERENCES

1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Dyspepsia. Management of dyspepsia in adults in primary care. Clinical Guideline 17. August 2004 (Updated June 2005) www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=CG017fullguideline

2. National Prescribing Centre. The initial management of dyspepsia in primary care. MeReC Bulletin 2006; 16: 9-12 www.npc.co.uk/MeReC_Bulletins/2006Volumes/Vol16_No3.pdf

3. Clinical Evidence freelance writers. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Clinical Evidence 2005;13:1-17 www.clinicalevidence.com/ceweb/conditionpdf/0403.pdf

4. Harvey RF, Athene Lane J, Murray LJ, Harvey IM, Donovan JL, Nair P. Randomised controlled trial of effects of Helicobacter pylori infection and its eradication on heartburn and gastro-oesophageal reflux: Bristol helicobacter project. BMJ 2004; 328: 1417-1419

5. Garside R, Pitt M, Somerville M, Stein K, Price A, Gilbert N. Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modeling. Health Technology Assessment 2006; Vol. 10: No.8 www.ncchta.org/fullmono/mon1008.pdf

6. Anonymous. H. pylori eradication in NSAID-associated ulcers. DTB 43; 5: 37-40 http://nhsia-lin-01.niss.ac.uk/idtb/content/db/pdf0505

7. Clinical Evidence freelance writers. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Clinical Evidence 2006;15:1-2 www.clinicalevidence.com/ceweb/conditionpdf/1108.pdf

8. National Prescribing Centre. Prescribing antiplatelet drugs in primary care. MeReC Bulletin 2005; 15: 21-24 www.npc.co.uk/MeReC_Bulletins/2004Volumes/Vol15no6.pdf

9. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Cardiovascular safety of NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors. May 2006
www.mhra.gov.uk/home/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&useSecondary=true&ssDocName=CON2023859&ssTargetNodeId=368


10. Kearney PM, Baignet C, Godwin J, Halls H, Emberson JR, Patrono C. Do selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk of atherothrombosis? Meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 2006; 332: 1302-1308

11. National Prescribing Centre. Cardiovascular risks of COX-2 inhibitors and NSAIDs confirmed. MeReC Rapid Review 2006; 2: 1-3 www.npc.co.uk/MeReC_rapid_reviews/2006-7/rapid_review2_cox2.pdf


 


SUMMARY

  • Urgent referral for endoscopic examination is indicated in all patients with alarm symptoms and those aged 55 years and older with unexplained and persistent recent-onset dyspepsia alone.
  • A PPI at a treatment dose should be offered to patients with GORD for 1-2 months. If symptoms recur after initial treatment, a PPI should be offered at the lowest dose possible to control symptoms.
  • A low dose PPI or H2RA should be tried for one month if symptoms persist in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia following testing for H. pylori and eradication if positive.
  • Patients with peptic ulcer disease should be tested for H. pylori and should receive eradication treatment if positive
  • If patients require NSAIDs to manage their pain the risk of GI adverse events should be assessed. If the patient is high risk then a gastroprotective agent (either a PPI or misoprostol) should be prescribed
 
 
Quarter to June 06
 
National
 
ITEMS/1000 PUs
NIC/1000 PUs
Antacids and simeticone
1.58
£5.23
Compound alginates, etc
16.13
£76.62
H2-receptor antagonists
13.36
£55.47
Proton pump inhibitors
89.64
£1,199.44

enlarge
Prescribng and Spending on Cardiovascular Drugs
Prescribing and Spending on Drugs for Dyspepsia in England for Quarter to June 2006

 

 

SearchBack to Top
   
   © NHS Business Services Authority
   Use of Personal Data - your rights, our responsibilities