|
Feedback from Public
Meeting: 30 October 2001
At the public meeting held in the London
attendees were asked to provide feedback to help design
future meetings.
Twenty-six members
of the public attended the meeting
Of those attending
the meeting 15 completed feedback forms amounting to
57.69% The results of this feedback are as follows:
Which sector do you represent?
How did you find out about this meeting?
Your opinion of the venue:
Additional comments on the venue:
- Excellent
- Ideal central location
- 1.00pm start, would have been good
to have a sandwich!
- Quite satisfactory
- Easy to find, nice venue
- Venue and room were fine and a good
template
- No indication of nearest tube given!
Your opinion on the pre-meeting demonstrations:
How relevant were
the demonstrations?
Additional comments
on the demonstrations:
- Limited demonstration given
Your opinion on the meeting:
How relevant were
the presentations?
Additional comments on the meeting:
- Personally I am grateful for the
opportunity of raising the points of concern.
- Graph titles confusing eg % growth
in number of prescriptions by BNF categories.
- Could not hear speaker without microphone
during question time.
- Would have liked more on trends in
prescribing/growth.
Do you have any suggestions/comments for future meetings,
or anything else you would like to add?
- Good venue
- Perhaps Birmingham next year
- Lunch would have been good!
- Explain how we can get involved
in pilots etc of ETP plus pilot sites monitoring prescription
growth.
- Questions well answered, presentations
full of useful information.
- Felt that some of presentations
(eg ETP) were too superficial; problems glossed over.
Endorsing of prescriptions remains a problem when
transferring information electronically to the PPA.
|
